This summary was graciously shared by Alex Walsh (@AlexSWalsh) and was based on the #KELTchat from September 9th, 2012. 

KELTChat Returns!

After an extended absence KELTChat returned with record numbers of participants to discuss the topic of ‘NEAT’.

More information needed

With enthusiasm for the topic overflowing the chat kicked off with a discussion as to what we can expect from the NEAT in comparison to TOEIC/TOEFL exams. @Michaelgriffin questioned whether the NEAT speaking section really is that similar to the current industry main players as some reviews have suggested 1. To truly compare what was being tested @ELTExperiences suggested we first gather some more information on the format of the NEAT speaking exam, despite @ChopEDU (who has recently completed an M.A assignment on this topic) rightly pointing out the dearth of information in English on this topic (a controversial yet insightful fact in itself) @BarryJamesonELT came up trumps with 2, @ChopEdu provided the following extremely useful links on assessment in general 3 and @michaelgriffin reinforced the relative wealth of information with 4.

After a quick skim of the provided links all agreed that the NEAT was introducing the assessment of the ‘4 skills’ into the Korean education system for students in middle school 3rd grade and below (2015 university applications).

How can we adapt our teaching to NEAT?

Our host for the evening (@josettelb) gently moved the discussion on to whether we are having to make any changes to our teaching approaches to help transition our students into the change. @bryanteacher pointed out that public school NETs have been largely uninvolved in the transition, a sentiment all agreed with, questionably a cause or effect of the dearth of English information.

The natural flow of the chat moved towards whether the test would involve critical thinking, @keisenhow summing up the evidence by stating it looked doubtful based on the information available, however @michaelgriffin suggested there is, at least, some real life application to the assessment, in agreement with @keisenhow that, for example, letter writing is a transferable real life skill. @AlexSWalsh meanwhile suggested that in the speaking assessment he had recently done on his students (which copied the speaking part of the NEAT exam, see 5 for more details) the students were required to incorporate both creative and divergent thinking skills, especially in the categories of ‘advice giving’ and ‘story telling’.

Time to prepare…

@MichaelGriffin, in his usual forward thinking manner, began questioning how we can help to overcome the ‘chaos’ of preparing students for the NEAT exam. @Bryanteacher pointed out the need to try and avoid what seems to be the knee jerk reaction in Korea of having students focus on regurgitation of memorized expressions, and @Seouldaddy sharing that perhaps huge changes don’t have to be made and a slow transition may be the best way. @AlexSWalsh suggested one way NETs can help is by building similar speaking activities into our lesson plans (for more information/examples see 6)

Poor students

There was concern amongst the participants about the effect this test will have on students, @Chopedu providing evidence that students will be ‘doubling down’ (having to do two sets of tests, the current KSAT plus the new NEAT exam 7), and it was pessimistically, but realistically agreed, that the NEAT could end up being exploited as just another way to make money by certain parts of the Korean EFL industry, which could also lead to a widening of the gap between urban and rural students.

On a positive note

On a more positive note it was pointed out that positive washback of NEAT may help push CLT and TBLT forward in Korea as well as the teaching of lexical ‘chunks’ of language, leaving a general scent of cautious optimism amongst the teachers.



6 – An article on EFL testing in Korea by Inn-Chul Choi

14 thoughts on “NEAT Test

  1. Pingback: NEAT Test | National English Ability Test (NEAT) |

  2. As always, I enjoyed participating in the chat and appreciate Josette’s efforts in moderating and Alex Walsh’s summary! After visiting and viewing some of these links, I think if we NESTs want to keep singing the “positive note”, and keep our jobs in the public school sector, we can continue to develop and deliver lessons based in TBLT that reflect the test items presented on the NEAT. I think it is a time rich with opportunity to ‘strut our stuff’!

  3. Nice points, Kristina. :)

    Below is a perspective from a Korean English teacher (in response to the summary)from my friend/former participant.

    She writes:

    Um, I don’t think I, myself am fully familiar with the NEAT yet. but my random thought on this aspect,”How we can help to overcome the ‘chaos’ of preparing students for the NEAT exam ” is it might not cause such a big confusion that we imagine. Last winter I got in-service program on line on “how to score speaking listening parts of NEAT,” which was to train teachers to be graders by practicing real responses of ss who took the NEAT and to give us a qualification. Though it seemed to have something to be improved, I got the feeling that ss would not have difficulty in preparing for it. The difficulty level is said to be similar to be one of speaking parts of middleschool textbooks in case of 3급 시헙. NEAT is not graded on a curve, it is an absolute evaluation, which is different from CSAT, whose purpose is grading ss from one to nine to screen out some from some. In this aspect, I am doubting personally about the possiblity of neat displacing CSAT fully….. This is my personal thought…

  4. Pingback: #KELTChat Preview: Autonomy & Fluency – Sunday 23rd September, 8pm | #KELTChat

  5. Pingback: South Korea | International Ed News

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s